Proposed fees draw some ire

By Jimmy Currier
Observer staff writer
Published on Sunday, May 24, 2009 2:07 PM MDT

Several business owners are upset about a proposed fee that city council is expected to discuss at its meeting on Wednesday.

The fee in question would be for fire inspection programs.

City council tabled the issue last Wednesday, but is expected to discuss it at the meeting on Wednesday at 6 p.m.

The amount of the fee would vary according to a buildings’ size and the scope of the inspection.

Mark Scott, who owns Twin Tip Nation, said the fee is just another tax burden placed on the backs of small business. Scott sent an Op-Ed to the Rio Rancho Observer, signed by six other business owners in the city, expressing opposition to any additional fees.

He said it wasn’t the amount but the principal of piling more fees and taxes on small businesses that has him irked.

“More than a penny is too much,” Scott said. “It is the principal, not the dollar amount. It has nothing to do with the police or fire department.”

City Manager James Jimenez said the fee is necessary to help cover the costs of the fire inspection program. He said during the annual budget process, the city’s administration reviewed all fees and charges and matched them to the services provided. Jimenez said the fire inspection program was not paying for itself, so he put together a fee proposal to cover a third of the program’s costs.

“This is a big step in trying to cover the costs of the fire inspection program,” Jimenez said. “It’s critically important because of the fire safety implications for the community.”

He also pointed out that the fire inspection program will help improve the city’s ISO (Insurance Services Office) rating, which could translate into insurance premium savings for business owners and home owners.”

Jimenez said the fee will bring Rio Rancho into line with other jurisdictions.

Scott believes small business owners are taxed enough and said the city tried to sneak this through without any input from business owners or the Chamber of Commerce.

The tough economy has hurt Scott’s business. He had to take a 50 percent pay cut and lay off three people.

In a memo, prepared by Fire Chief James Tobin and approved by Jimenez, on the fees, it states the city recognizes the need to have businesses pay their fair share of costs for services provided.

Scott says that small businesses already pay their fair share.

“It’s really tough out there and tough for the city, but I can’t go to my customers and say I mandate you to send me extra money, but the city is doing that to me,” Scott said. “I don’t know when it’s going to end.”

Tobin stated in the memo that the fees are charged for special permits and fire inspections based on hazard and size constraints. Businesses that are larger or provide more hazardous products or processes bear the appropriate fees to cover actual charges for city work performed.

Scott understands that times are tight and he doesn’t want the city to lay anyone off. However, he said the city needs to be more innovative in its funding.

“I want the City of Rio Rancho to lead in innovation and creativity, which will allow them to produce more gross receipts taxes and make our city healthier and stronger,” Scott said. “That’s exactly what I’m doing with my company. At the end of the recession, my company will come out stronger because of my creativity and innovation.”

District 1 city councilor Mike Williams said he will probably vote to implement the fee.

“It’s not more than any place else,” he said. “These inspections have to be done and you’ve got to pay for people’s time. It’s not cheap to send a fire inspector out to a building. When you own a business, you always have additional costs. This is part of owning a business.”

Scott and several other business owners are upset that corporations like Hewlett-Packard are getting tax breaks and incentives, while small businesses have to pay extra fees.

Williams countered that argument by saying that small businesses will benefit from HP and other companies coming to Rio Rancho, because they will bring in thousands of employees and some will patronize the small businesses.

District 6 city councilor Kathy Colley said she will vote for the fees.

“This is something that the chief has looked at and I have to defer to him on this,” Colley said. “He knows best what his operating expenses are and I’m glad that the fire department is taking the time to do their homework and inform the business community.”

Comments

WRITE A COMMENT

Use the form below to post a brief comment to this story, or respond to other readers. Please use the word count tool to assist you in keeping your remarks to 100 words or fewer.

Comments must be approved by an editor before appearing on the Web site. Editors review submitted comments periodically during the day for offensive or off-topic content before posting. Your thoughtful contribution to the online discussion is appreciated.

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of the Rio Rancho Observer.

Benjamin Dover wrote on May 24, 2009 3:25 PM:

" The City leaders are clueless. They think they can keep raising fees and taxes and people will line up to pay them. They don't realize that the boom from a few years ago was the exception, not the rule.

Higher fees will choke off growth and result in a fiscal crisis if these guys don't wake up to economic reality. That goes double for the ever increasing impact fees choking off new building permit growth. "

Tea Drinker wrote on May 25, 2009 9:22 AM:

" I find is very suspicious that the City of Rio Rancho is completely broke and the city manager decides to start enacting new fees. As it is businesses pay extremely high impact fees in Rio Rancho along with all the other inspections and fees the city imposes. This just shows how unfriendly the city administration is to small business in Rio Rancho. Also Mr. Jemenez, using the excuse that other neighboring cities are doing it is not a justification to impose the fee in Rio Rancho. "

Chuck Wilkins wrote on May 26, 2009 4:33 PM:

" They tell us they need a tax to bring hospitals, now they are on hold but our tax is not. Impact fees for business are twice what Albuquerque is but we don't compare those fees. We will fine a person more for a 5 mph speed ticket than a careless driving.
And small business account for more jobs than big business. Not to mention the approx 7 million they gave to HP, how many inspections would that pay for? Around 233 yrs. 7million / 30k in fees. "

sorry noname wrote on May 26, 2009 9:45 PM:

" Might this story be better if you gave us readers some idea of the dollar amounts here?? What are these fees, ten bucks or $500?. "

Ret-Cop wrote on May 28, 2009 9:49 AM:

" This should be a service provided to businesses at no extra charge.
I say "extra" because businesses already pay more than their "fair share" now.
The City of Rio Rancho, the State of New Mexico and the nation would not exist without businesses. "

Puzzled wrote on May 29, 2009 6:39 AM:

" I find it puzzling that Mark Scott, as a business man, doesn't understand the value of a conpany like HP coming to Rio Rancho. Just ask Colorado Springs of the the value. I do everything i can to support small businesses in Rio Rancho, but I'm shocked when they don't understand business in the larger picture.

Tax incentives to larger companies get them here. We can thank former administrations in this country for that.

When Mark Scott can employ 1800+ people, then he can pull up a chair at the grown-up table. "

Tea Drinker wrote on May 29, 2009 4:22 PM:

" Its not the large companies that provide the bulk of the jobs in this city, state and country. Therefore as a whole the small business community contributes more taxes to our goverment than big business. "

Also Puzzled... wrote on May 29, 2009 5:17 PM:

" I have to agree with Puzzled on this. I see comments like Chuck Wilkins and wonder where he learned about economics. Yes small businesses employ millions of people, but small businesses also lose millions of jobs a year.

When you look at it from a rational economic perspective, you need both large and small businesses in an area, and when someone like Wilkins seems to favor small over large for Rio Rancho, I hope people see how foolish that really is. "

Puzzled wrote on Jun 1, 2009 4:22 PM:

" Boy, Tea Drinker, you must have something strong in that tea. Cities compete for companies like HP because they can employ 100x more people than a ski shop can employee. Just ask Colorado Springs how they are getting on with their "small businesses" now that HP is gone.

So 1800+ people will be getting paid by HP, paying taxes, contributing to the consumer spending in the city, and a bunch of nail salons, automotive shops, and a ski shop is more valuable? Drink some more tea... "

Tea Drinker wrote on Jun 2, 2009 10:12 AM:

" Small business have to eliminate jobs because politicians intfere in their businesses with fees, increased taxes and laws which make it extremely hard for a business to run, all the while giving the big business the breaks. Obviously you don't run a business and just collect a pay check. "

Puzzled wrote on Jun 2, 2009 12:56 PM:

" Obviously, you don't understand basic economics when an expanded consumer base = more customers = more money for your business.

I would rather see an HP coming into the area over another nail salon, ski shop, or automotive store.

If the city needs to grease the wheels for HP, they have my support.

Also, after witnessing the busniess models for most Rio Rancho businesses, they seem to know about as much about business as you. Drink some more tea... "

Chuck Wilkins wrote on Jun 2, 2009 1:11 PM:

" Also Puzzled,

I don't favor small business over large but want a balance. There is no incentive for a small business to come here. NO Tax break, NO free infrusture, No wavied impact fees, and on. What do we get back from HP? 1800 jobs, Their first job fair was in Albuquerque till I mentioned it. How many employees will live outside of Rio Rancho? How about Gross Reciepts? Last time I bought something over the internet or call center I didn't pay taxes. Oh, property taxes, no they will not be paying the city property taxes. Continued- "

Chuck Wilkins wrote on Jun 2, 2009 1:21 PM:

" Now on the hospitals, we will be paying approx 13million a year to help the hospitals. Last time I paid my insurance premium it was a health amout, last time a family member went to the hospital it was a health amount, not to mention the rates increase every year. The hospitals said they are coming without the tax so why subsidize them? I am already here so any future changes will not help me but maybe it will help other small businesses. Oh, large companies lose jobs too, like GM, Eclipse,& Intel to mention a few. "

Chuck Wilkins wrote on Jun 2, 2009 1:34 PM:

" I would like to mention a few things that would help small businesses start up.
1. Credit towards infrastructure, credit what the first year projected use will be.
2. No Gross Receipts for the 1st 6 months.
3. Match surround communities impact fees.
4. Credit for every 10 employees.
5. Advertise to community how important it is to buy from Rio Rancho business to keep tax dollars here and working for us.

Lastly I would like to say is we need to way what we are paying the large companies to come against what we are get back. "

Mary Datwyler wrote on Jun 8, 2009 2:47 PM:

" I am a business owner in RR and fire code compliant for 2009. As the Council considers imposing the fire inspection fee for storefront business, it should impose the same fee for home occupation business permit holders as they are also doing business in our community. New businesses should pay an initial fire inspection fee to get their inspections for the required certificate of occupancy before opening. How will this proposed fee be collected by the City (who pays the administrative costs?), and will enforceable consequences exist for the business owners who don't pay their share? "

Mark Scott wrote on Jun 9, 2009 12:36 PM:

" Dear Ms. Puzzled, Personal attacks? Afraid to post your real name. We are not surprised. As you usually do, you are missing the point.. You have proven with your comments, the lack of understanding that we need small, medium and large companies. Soon your job here in RR will be over and you can go to another city and do nothing for them also. "

Tea Drinker wrote on Jun 16, 2009 4:54 PM:

" Maybe puzzled you ought to take another look at your economics. Big business gets all the tax breaks while small business gets none and pay even more fees. So all those new customers come in from big business and they have no place to eat, buy cloths, get their cars fixed becaue small business cannot afford to open with high impact fees, taxes and inspection fees. Therefore where does all those tax dollars go? Down the hill to Albuquerque who is nice to small business. Tea is better than kool aide. "

You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.

Registered users sign in here:

Become a Registered User

Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
E-mail Address:
Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

First Name:
Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
 

Classifieds


WEATHER FOR
RIO RANCHO, N.M.